Method and device for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated transmitted signal

ABSTRACT

A method for clock synchronisation between an amplitude-modulated or phase-modulated received signal (r(t)) and a transmitted signal (s(t)) estimates the timing offset (ε) between the received signal (r(t)) and the transmitted signal (s(t)) by means of a maximum-likelihood method. The maximum-likelihood method in this context is realised by an estimation filtering (S40; S140) dependent upon the transmission characteristic, a subsequent nonlinear signal-processing function (S50; S150) and an averaging filtering (S60, S100; S180, S200) The received signal (r(t)) is especially a modified vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r VSB ′(t)). The nonlinear signal-processing function (S50; S150) maintains the alternating component in the spectrum of the pre-filtered vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (v VSB ′(t)).

The invention relates to a method and a device for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated transmitted signal (VSB).

When transmitters and receivers are synchronised with one another within a transmission system, a transmitter-end and receiver-end adaptation of the clock signal and the carrier signal is implemented respectively with regard to the phase position and frequency. The clock synchronisation considered in the following paragraphs requires a clock recovery in the receiver, which can be realised with or without feedback

In the case of a clock recovery with feedback, the clock phase and clock frequency is estimated on the basis of the received signal, and a frequency oscillator is re-tuned for phase-synchronous and frequency-synchronous sampling of the received signal at the correct inter-symbol, interference-free decision timings.

By contrast, in the case of clock recovery without feedback, the clock phase and clock frequency are estimated on the basis of the received signal sampled at a fixed sampling frequency, and the symbol value of the received signal, which is correct at the respective decision timing, is determined via an interpolator from the sampled values, which are adjacent at the respective inter-symbol-interference-free decision timings.

Regarding a clock recovery without feedback with a clock frequency, which is fixed and known to the receiver, a method based on the maximum-likelihood estimation for pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM), quadrature-phase-modulated (QPSK) and π/4-quadrature-phase-modulated (π/4-QPSK) signals is already known from [1]: K. Schmidt: “Digital clock recovery for bandwidth-efficient mobile telephone systems” [Digitale Taktrückgewinnung für bandbreiteneffiziente Mobilfunksysteme], 1994, ISBN 3-18-14 7510-6.

The maximum-likelihood estimation in this context is based on maximising the likelihood function, which minimises the square of the modulus error between a measured, noise-laden received signal and a modelled, ideally noise-free transmitted signal containing the sought timing offset over an observation period via an inverse exponential function. The sought timing offset is derived, when the modelled, transmitted signal approximates the measured, received signal with minimum modulus error squared.

As described in [1] and shown in greater detail below, the likelihood function is obtained from the received signal convoluted with the impulse response of a signal-adapted pre-filter, which is subjected, after pre-filtering, to a nonlinear function and then averaged over a limited number of symbols. As also demonstrated in [1], the nonlinear function can also be approximated by a modulus squaring If the timing offset is determined in the time domain, the sought timing offset is derived from a maximum detection of the pre-filtered, modulus-squared and averaged received signal according to the maximum-likelihood function.

The disadvantage of an inaccurate and/or ambiguous maximum detection in the time domain, which results from inadequate removal of interference in the useful signal, can be avoided by an observation in the frequency domain. In the case of a determination of the timing offset in the frequency domain, the fact is exploited that the pre-filtered, modulus-squared received signal averaged over a limited number of symbols provides a basic periodicity over the symbol length and, respectively, with multiples of the symbol length, provides a maximum. Accordingly, after a discrete Fourier transformation of the pre-filtered, modulus-squared received signal averaged over a given number of symbols, the timing offset can be determined from the phase of the spectral line at the basic spectral frequency determined by the symbol frequency.

As will be shown in detail below, the frequency-domain-orientated determination of the timing offset outlined above fails with a vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal, because the VSB received signal provides no periodicity and no corresponding spectral lines, which are necessary for determining the timing offset in the frequency domain.

The invention is therefore based on the object of providing a method and a device for determining the timing offset in the frequency domain for the clock synchronisation of a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal.

The object of the invention is achieved by a method for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal with the features of claim 1 and by a device for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal with the features according to claim 16. Advantageous further developments of the invention are specified in the dependent claims.

According to the invention, the symbol duration of the VSB signal is designed with one half of the symbol duration of a PAM, QPSK or π/4-QPSK signal. The invention also provides a down mixing of a VSB baseband received signal of this kind in order to form a modified VSB baseband received signal, which has identical signal behaviour to an offset QPSK signal.

Finally, instead of a modulus squaring, as in the case of a PAM, QPSK or π/4-QPSK signal, a squaring without modulus formation is implemented according to the invention as a nonlinear signal-processing function. The alternating components of the in-phase and the quadrature components of the pre-filtered, vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) baseband received signal are therefore constructively superimposed and lead to spectral lines, which can be identified by the subsequent, discrete Fourier transformation and supplied for subsequent spectral processing in order to determine the timing offset.

According to the invention, the discrete Fourier transformation of the pre-filtered, squared VSB baseband received signal, which has been averaged over a given number of symbols, is evaluated only at the positive and negative symbol frequency. Spectral lines of a higher value occurring periodically at the symbol frequency need not be taken into consideration, because no other harmonics are present in a Nyquist system with nonlinearity.

The carrier-frequency synchronisation, which is to be implemented on the received signal alongside the clock synchronisation, can be provided in cascade before or after the clock synchronisation. If the carrier frequency synchronisation according to the invention is carried out after the clock synchronisation, the pre-filtered, squared received signal, averaged over a given number of symbols, must be compensated by comparison with any carrier frequency offset and carrier phase offset, which may occur in the received signal, in order to achieve a correct determination of the timing offset of the clock pulse. With a positive symbol frequency, the Fourier transform of the received signal is therefore conjugated and then multiplied by the Fourier transform of the negative symbol frequency.

In an operational case affected by a carrier-frequency offset, since the spectral lines for a received signal free from a carrier-frequency offset coming to be disposed at the positive and negative symbol frequency are frequency-displaced at the positive or respectively negative symbol frequency by the carrier-frequency offset, the averaging filtering must be divided into a first averaging filtering with a second averaging filtering following the first averaging filtering. The throughput range of the first averaging filtering in this context should be designed so that the spectral line, frequency-displaced by the carrier-frequency offset relative to the positive or respectively negative symbol frequency, is registered by the first averaging filtering. The mid-frequencies of the first averaging filtering, realised as a Dirac comb in the time domain and correspondingly in the frequency domain as periodically-repeated Si functions, are therefore disposed respectively at multiples of the symbol frequency and provide a bandwidth, which corresponds to the maximum carrier-frequency offset to be anticipated. The large averaging length required for an optimum averaging of the pre-filtered and squared VSB baseband received signal, which accordingly determines a narrow-band averaging filtering and is therefore opposed to the bandwidth-expanded, first averaging filtering, is realised by the second averaging filtering, of which the averaging length is a multiple of the averaging length of the first averaging filtering and is therefore designed to have a substantially narrower band than the first averaging filtering.

In a first embodiment of the method according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal and of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal, the first averaging filtering is implemented after the squaring, while the second averaging filtering takes place after the discrete Fourier transformation and conjugation or respectively multiplication of the Fourier transforms localised at the positive and negative symbol frequency, which follow the first averaging filtering.

In a second embodiment of the method according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal and of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal, the first averaging filtering is implemented in each case following the discrete Fourier transformation or respectively conjugation and the second averaging filtering, after the multiplication of the two Fourier transforms averaged respectively with the first averaging filtering and localised at the positive or respectively negative symbol frequency.

The estimation filtering achieves a minimising of the data-dependent jitter in the VSB baseband received signal.

Finally, if the sideband of the VSB baseband received signal is disposed in the inverted position, the down mixing of the VSB baseband received signal is preceded by a mirroring of the sideband of the VSB baseband received signal from its inverted position into its normal position.

The two embodiments of the method according to the invention for clock synchronisation of the vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal and the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation of the vestigial-sideband-modulated (VSB) signal, are explained in greater detail below with reference to the drawings. The drawings are as follows:

FIG. 1 shows an expanded block circuit diagram of the transmission system;

FIG. 2 shows a reduced block circuit diagram of the transmission system;

FIG. 3 shows a circuit diagram of the device for clock synchronisation according to the prior art;

FIGS. 4A, 4B show a frequency response of the transmission filter for a PAM, QPSK or π/4-QPSK signal with a roll-off factor of 1 and 0.5;

FIGS. 4C, 4D show a frequency response of the overall transmission path with a roll-off factor of 1 and 0.5;

FIG. 5 shows a frequency response of the transmission filter for a VSB signal;

FIG. 6 shows a block circuit diagram of a first embodiment of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal;

FIG. 7 shows a flow chart of a first embodiment of the method according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal;

FIG. 8 shows a frequency response of the estimation filter consisting of receiver filter and pre-filter;

FIG. 9 shows a block circuit diagram of a second embodiment of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal; and

FIG. 10 shows a flow chart of a second embodiment of the method according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal.

Before describing the two embodiments of the method according to the invention and the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 5 to 10 of the drawings, the following section presents a derivation of the necessary mathematical background.

In a first stage, clock synchronisation with a QPSK signal using maximum-likelihood estimation is described as the prior art, so that the knowledge obtained can be transferred as an inventive step to clock synchronisation with a VSB signal.

The starting point is a complex baseband model of a transmission system for time-continuous complex signals, of which the expanded block circuit diagram is shown in FIG. 1.

The complex symbol sequence s(t) of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK signal to be transmitted as shown in equation (1) is connected to the input of the transmission system 1: $\begin{matrix} {{s(t)} = {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}\quad{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {\delta\left( {t - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} + {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}\quad{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {\delta\left( {t - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

In this context, a_(R)(n) and a_(I)(n) represent symbol values for the in-phase and quadrature components of the PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK transmitted signal to be generated, which can assume, for example, the real values {±s_(i)} of the symbol alphabet. The symbol sequences of the in-phase and quadrature components respectively are periodic with regard to the symbol length T_(s). In terms of system theory, the symbol sequence s(t) to be transmitted is convoluted in the transmitter filter 2 with its impulse response h_(s)(t) and supplies the filtered symbol sequence s_(F)(t) at the output of the transmitter filter 2 according to equation (2): $\begin{matrix} {{s_{F}(t)} = {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}\quad{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} + {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}\quad{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

The subsequent lag element 3 models the timing offset ε·T occurring as a result of absent or inadequate synchronisation between the transmitter and receiver, which is derived from a timing offset ε to be determined by the method according to the invention or the device according to the invention. The timing offset ε in this context can assume positive and negative values, typically between ±0.5. Taking into consideration the timing offset ε·T at the output of the lag element 3, the filtered symbol sequence s_(ε)(t) is therefore derived according to equation (3): $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{s_{ɛ}(t)} = {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}\quad{{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot h_{S\quad}}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}} +}} \\ {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}\quad{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}} \\ \quad \end{matrix} & (3) \end{matrix}$

In a quadrature modulator, which is modelled as the multiplier 4 in FIG. 1, the lag-laden, filtered symbol sequence s_(ε)(t) is mixed with a complex carrier signal e^(j(2π(f) ^(T) ^(+Δf)t+Δφ)) to form a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated transmitted signal s_(HF)(t). The carrier signal e^(j(2π(f) ^(T) ^(+Δf)t+Δφ)) has a carrier frequency f_(T), which provides a frequency offset Δf and phase offset Δφ as a result of defective carrier-frequency synchronisation. Without taking into consideration signal errors of the quadrature modulator—for example, crosstalk of the carrier signal in the in-phase or quadrature channel, gain imbalance between the in-phase and quadrature channel, quadrature errors between in-phase and the quadrature channel—the mathematical context for the PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated transmitted signal s_(HF)(t) presented in equation (4) is derived: $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{s_{H\quad F}(t)} = \left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} + {j \cdot}} \right.} \\ {\left. {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2\pi\quad{({f_{T} + {\Delta\quad f}})}t} + {\Delta\quad\varphi}})}}} \\ \quad \end{matrix} & (4) \end{matrix}$

On the transmission path between the transmitter and the receiver, an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) n(t) is additively superimposed on the PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated transmitted signal s_(HF)(t), which provides a real and imaginary component N_(R)(t) and n_(I)(t) as shown in equation (5): n(t)=n _(R)(t)+j·n _(I)(t)  (5)

The received signal r_(HF)(t) arriving at the receiver accordingly results from equation (6): r _(HF)(t)=s _(HF)(t)+n(t)  (6)

In the receiver, the PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated received signal r_(HF)(t) with superimposed noise n(t) is mixed down into the baseband with the carrier signal e^(−j2πf) ^(T) ^(t) in a demodulator, which is modelled as the multiplier 5 in FIG. 1. The de-modulated received signal r(t) at the output of the demodulator 5, which contains an in-phase and quadrature symbol sequence distorted with the frequency offset and phase offset of the carrier signal, is therefore derived according to equation (7): $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{r(t)} = {{{s_{ɛ}(t)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{{{j2\pi}\quad\Delta\quad f} + {\Delta\quad\varphi}})}} + {n(t)}}} \\ {= \left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} + {j \cdot}} \right.} \\ {{\left. {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{a_{I}{(n) \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}} \right\rbrack \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2\pi\quad\Delta\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\quad\varphi}})}}} + {n(t)}} \end{matrix} & (7) \end{matrix}$

As can be seen from the equation (7), some of the system-theoretical effects of the modulator 4 and the demodulator 5 of the transmission system 1 on the PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated signal are cancelled, so that the modulator 4 and the demodulator 5 in FIG. 1 can be replaced by a single multiplier 6, as shown in the reduced block circuit diagram in FIG. 2, which mixes the lag-laden, filtered symbol sequence s_(ε)(t) with a signal e^(j(2π(f) ^(T) ^(+Δf)t+Δφ)) according to equation (8) to form a transmitted signal s_(NF)(t) in the baseband. $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{s_{NF}(t)} = \left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} + {j \cdot}} \right.} \\ {\left. {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{a_{I}{(n) \cdot {h_{S\quad}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}} \right\rbrack \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2\pi\quad\Delta\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\quad\varphi}})}}} \\ \quad \end{matrix} & (8) \end{matrix}$

The transmitted signal s(t) with the additively superimposed, additive white Gaussian noise n(t) according to the reduced block circuit diagram in FIG. 2 is received in the receiver as a received signal r(t), which corresponds to the received signal according to equation (7) of the expanded block circuit diagram according to FIG. 1.

The received signal r(t) is convoluted in an estimation filter 8 according to equation (9) with its impulse response h_(EST)(t) and leads to the signal v(t) at the output of the estimation filter 8, which represents a filtered in-phase and quadrature symbol sequence distorted with regard to signal error, frequency offset and phase offset: v(t)=r(t)*h _(EST)(t)  (9)

In the case of a PAM, QPSK and π/4 QPSK signal, document [1] discloses a method for determining the timing offset ε in the clock synchronisation, which represents the prior art and therefore allows a better understanding of the method according to the invention and the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation in the case of an offset QPSK signal. This method is therefore described below.

According to [1], the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u) shown in equation (10), which is dependent upon the timing offset ε and the symbol values $\underset{\_}{u} = {\sum\limits_{v\quad}^{\quad}\quad u_{v}}$ transmitted in the observation period, is described as a modulus-error-squared, integrated over the observation period T₀ between the registered, noise-laden received signal r(t) and the ideal, noise-free, modelled transmitted signal s(t) subject to the sought timing offset ε. $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{L\left( {ɛ❘\underset{\_}{u}} \right)} = {\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{1}{N_{0}}}{\int\limits_{T_{0}}{{{{r{(t)}} - {\overset{\_}{s}{({t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ})}}}}^{2}{\mathbb{d}t}}}}} \\ {= {{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{1}{N_{0}}}{\int\limits_{T_{0}}{{{{r^{2}{(t)}} - {2{r{(t)}}{\overset{\_}{s}{({t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ})}}} + {{\overset{\_}{s}}^{2}{({t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ})}}}}^{2}{\mathbb{d}t}}}} \leq 1}} \\ \quad \end{matrix} & (10) \end{matrix}$

The use of the inverted exponential function and the division of the argument of the exponential function by the noise power density N₀ leads to a scaling of the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u) to values less than one. In order to neutralise the likelihood functioning L(ε) from the symbol values u transmitted in the time interval T₀, the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u) over the observation period T₀ is linked with the interconnected distribution density function p _(a) (u), which describes the probability of occurrence of the symbol values u transmitted in the time interval T₀ within the symbol alphabet a, as shown in equation (11). $\begin{matrix} {{L(ɛ)} = {\int\limits_{\underset{\_}{u}}{{{L\left( {ɛ❘\underset{\_}{u}} \right)} \cdot {p_{\underset{\_}{a}}\left( \underset{\_}{u} \right)}}{\mathbb{d}\underset{\_}{u}}}}} & (11) \end{matrix}$

The maximum-likelihood estimation can, in principle, be implemented within the framework of a simplified model for clock recovery over a limited number of symbols with an infinitely long observation time T₀ or within the framework of a more realistic model for clock recovery over an unlimited number of symbols with a limited observation time T₀. The simplified model is presented here. In this case, an integration of the moduluis-error squared over an infinite integration period is derived according to equation (12) for the mathematical relationship of the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u) in equation (10): $\begin{matrix} {{L\left( {ɛ❘\underset{\_}{u}} \right)} = {\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{1}{N_{0}}}{\underset{- \infty}{\int\limits^{+ \infty}}{{{{r^{2}{(t)}} - {2{r{(t)}}{\overset{\_}{s}{({t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ})}}} + {{\overset{\_}{s}}^{2}{({t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ})}}}}^{2}{\mathbb{d}t}}}}} & (12) \end{matrix}$

The following considerations apply for the individual terms in the integral of the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u) of the equation (12):

Since the term for the squared received signal r²(t) is independent of the timing offset ε, this term can be taken as a constant before the exponential function.

With a limited symbol number N. the modelled transmitted signal s(t, u, ε) according to equation (13) is described, by way of deviation from equation (3), as a multiplicatively linked Dirac comb with the symbol duration T_(s), and the symbol values u_(V), which is convoluted with the impulse response h_(s)(t) of the transmitter filter 3. $\begin{matrix} {{\overset{\_}{s}\left( {t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{u_{v} \cdot T_{S} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}} & (13) \end{matrix}$

Taking into consideration the scaling of the transmitter filter 3 presented in equation (14), the mathematical context described in equation (15) is derived for the integral of the squared, modelled transmitted signal s ²(t, u, ε): $\begin{matrix} {{T_{S} \cdot {h_{S}(0)}} = {{\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{T_{S} \cdot {h_{S}^{2}(t)}}{\mathbb{d}t}}} = 1}} & (14) \\ \begin{matrix} {{\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{{\overset{\_}{s}}^{2}\left( {t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ} \right)}{\mathbb{d}t}}} = {\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{T_{S}^{2} \cdot u_{n}^{2} \cdot {h_{S}^{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}}} \\ {= {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{T_{S} \cdot u_{n}^{2}}}} \end{matrix} & (15) \end{matrix}$

The mathematical context shown in equation (16) is derived for the integral of the product of the received signal and the modelled transmitted signal r(t)· s(t,u,ε): $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{{r(t)} \cdot {\overset{\_}{s}\left( {t,\underset{\_}{u},ɛ} \right)}}{\mathbb{d}t}}} = {\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{r(t)} \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{{T_{S} \cdot u_{n} \cdot {h_{S}\begin{pmatrix} {t -} \\ {{ɛ\quad T} - {nT}_{S}} \end{pmatrix}}}{\mathbb{d}t}}}}}} \\ {= {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{T_{S} \cdot u_{n} \cdot {\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{{r(t)} \cdot {h_{S}\begin{pmatrix} {t -} \\ {{ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \end{pmatrix}}}{\mathbb{d}t}}}}}} \\ {= {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{T_{S} \cdot u_{n} \cdot \begin{bmatrix} {{r\left( {{nT}_{S} + {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)}*} \\ {h_{S}\left( {{- {nT}_{S}} - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \end{bmatrix}}}} \\ {= {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{T_{S} \cdot u_{n} \cdot {e\left( {{nT}_{S} + {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)}}}} \end{matrix} & (16) \end{matrix}$

The mathematical relationship of the estimation filter 8 in equation (9) is taken into consideration in the last step of equation (16).

Now, if the knowledge obtained above for the mathematical terms of the integral of the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u) in equation (12) are taken into consideration, the mathematical relationship shown in equation (17) is obtained for the conditional likelihood function L(ε|u): $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{L\left( ɛ \middle| \underset{\_}{u} \right)} = {{const} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{T}{N_{0}}}{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{\lbrack{u_{n}^{2} - {2u_{n}{e{({{nT}_{S} + {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}}}\rbrack}}}}} \\ {= {{const} \cdot {\prod\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{T_{S}}{N_{0}}}{({u_{n}^{2} - {2u_{n}{e{({{nT}_{S} + {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}}})}}}}} \end{matrix} & (17) \end{matrix}$

Because of the statistically-independent occurrence of the individual symbols, equation (18) applies for the interconnected distribution density function p_(a)(u): $\begin{matrix} {{p_{\underset{\_}{a}}\left( \underset{\_}{u} \right)} = {\prod\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{p_{a_{n}}\left( u_{n} \right)}}} & (18) \end{matrix}$

Accordingly, the mathematical relationship in equation (19) is derived for the likelihood function L(ε), which is converted, by introducing the log-likelihood function l(ε)=ln(L(ε)) into the corresponding mathematical relationship for the log likelihood function l(ε) in equation (20): $\begin{matrix} {{L(ɛ)} = {{const} \cdot {\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{\prod\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{{{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{T_{S}}{N_{0}}}{({u_{n}^{2} - {2u_{n}{e{({{nT}_{S} + {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}}})}} \cdot {p_{a_{n}}\left( u_{n} \right)}}{\mathbb{d}u_{n}}}}}}} & (19) \\ {{l(ɛ)} = {{const} \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1}{\ln\begin{pmatrix} {\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \frac{T_{S}}{N_{0}}}{({u_{n}^{2} - {2u_{n}{e{({{nT}_{S} + {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}}})}} \cdot}} \\ {{p_{a_{n}}\left( u_{n} \right)}{\mathbb{d}u_{n}}} \end{pmatrix}}}}} & (20) \end{matrix}$

As equation (20) shows, the log likelihood function l(ε) can be interpreted from a filtering of the received signal r(t) with an estimation filter—signal e(nT_(s)+εT_(s))—, a nonlinear signal processing—inverted exponential function, integration, logarithm function—and an averaging—summation—.

The nonlinear signal-processing function can be approximated by a modulus squaring, as shown in [1].

The block circuit diagram presented in FIG. 3 of a device for determining the timing offset ε for the clock synchronisation of a PAM, QPSK and/or π/4 QPSK signal on the basis of a maximum-likelihood estimation, which represents the prior art, is obtained in the above manner.

Before the estimation filter 7, the received signal r(t) is sampled in a sampling and holding element 8 at a sampling rate f_(A), which is increased by comparison with the symbol frequency f_(s), of the received signal r(t) by the oversampling factor os. In this context, the oversampling factor Os must have a value of at least 8, because, with a roll-off factor r of the estimation filter 7 of one (r=1), the frequency spectrum of the sampled, received signal e(t) provides frequency components less than or equal to the symbol frequency (|f|±f_(s)), as a result of the subsequent modulus squaring, which corresponds to a convolution, the bandwidth of the signal is doubled, and another multiplication of the signal then takes place, which additionally doubles the bandwidth of the signal.

If the transmitter filter 2 according to equation (21) has a frequency spectrum H_(s)(f), which corresponds to a cosine filter with a roll-off factor r, the combined frequency spectrum H_(EST)(f) of the estimation filter 7 according to equation (22) must be designed dependent upon the frequency spectrum H_(s)(f) of the transmitter filter 2, in order to minimise data-dependent jitter in the received signal r(t). $\begin{matrix} {{H_{s}(f)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} 1 & {{{für}\quad{f}} < \frac{f_{S}}{2}} \\ {\cos\left\lbrack {\frac{\pi{f}}{2{rf}_{S}} - \frac{\pi\left( {1 - r} \right)}{4r}} \right\rbrack} & {{{für}\quad\left( {1 - r} \right)\frac{f_{S}}{2}} < {f} \leq {\left( {1 + r} \right)\frac{f_{S}}{2}}} \\ 0 & {{{für}\quad\left( {1 + r} \right)\frac{f_{S}}{2}} < {f}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (21) \\ {{H_{EST}(f)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{H_{S}\left( {f - f_{S}} \right)} + {H_{S}\left( {f + f_{S}} \right)}} & {{{für}\quad{f}} \leq {\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {1 + r} \right)}} \\ {beliebig} & {{{für}\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {1 + r} \right)} < {f} \leq f_{S}} \\ 0 & {{fürf}_{S} < {f}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (22) \end{matrix}$ [beliebig=random; für=for]

The frequency response H_(s)(f) of the transmitter filter 2 is presented in FIG. 4A for a roll-off factor r=1, and in FIG. 4B for a roll-off factor r=0.5. The frequency response H_(GES)(f)=H_(s)(f)·H_(EST)(f) of the transmission system as a whole, consisting of transmitter filter 2 and estimation filter 7, is presented for a roll-off factor r=1 in FIG. 4C, and for a roll off factor r=0.5 in FIG. 4D.

If the frequency response H_(GES)(f) in FIG. 4C or FIG. 4D respectively is observed, this frequency response can be interpreted according to equation (23) as a low-pass filter H_(GES0)(f) symmetrical to the frequency f=0 with a bandwidth of ${\frac{f_{S}}{2} \cdot r},$ which is frequency-displaced respectively by ${\pm \frac{f_{S}}{2}}\text{:}$ $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{H_{GES}(f)} = {{H_{{GES}\quad 0}(f)}*\left( {{\delta\left( {f - \frac{f_{S}}{2}} \right)} + {\delta\left( {f + \frac{f_{S}}{2}} \right)}} \right)}} \\ {= {{H_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {f - \frac{f_{S}}{2}} \right)} + {H_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {f + \frac{f_{S}}{2}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} & (23) \end{matrix}$

The corresponding impulse response h_(GES)(t) is therefore derived according to equation (24): $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{h_{GES}(t)} = {{h_{{GES}\quad 0}(t)} \cdot \left( {{\mathbb{e}}^{{j2\pi}\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}t} + {\mathbb{e}}^{{- {j2\pi}}\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}t}} \right)}} \\ {= {{h_{{GES}\quad 0}(t)} \cdot {\cos\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}t} \right)}}} \end{matrix} & (24) \end{matrix}$

According to equation (25), the signal v(t) at the output of the estimation filter 7 can therefore be obtained in that the impulse response h_(s)(t) of the transmitter filter 2 in the transmitter signal s_(NF)(t) in the baseband according to equation (8) is replaced by the impulse response h_(GES)(t) of the transmission system as a whole: $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{v(t)} = {{s_{NF}(t)}*{h_{GES}(t)}}} \\ {= {\begin{bmatrix} {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{GES}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} +} \\ {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{GES}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}}} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2{\pi\Delta}\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\varphi}})}}}} \end{matrix} & (25) \end{matrix}$

Starting from equation (25), the impulse response h_(GES)(t−εT_(s)−nT_(s)) can be described by equation (26) $\begin{matrix} {{h_{GES}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} = {{h_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n} \cdot {\cos\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}}} & (26) \end{matrix}$

The mathematical relationship for the signal v(t) at the output of the estimation filter 7 can be described according to equation (29) with the combined terms from equations (27) and (28): $\begin{matrix} {{R(t)} = {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n}}}} & (27) \\ {{I(t)} = {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n}}}} & (28) \\ {{v(t)} = {\left\lbrack {{R(t)} + {j \cdot {I(t)}}} \right\rbrack \cdot {\cos\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2{\pi\Delta}\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\quad\varphi}})}}}} & (29) \end{matrix}$

In the modulus squarer 9, the in-phase and quadrature components of the signal v(t) are respectively squared and then added, so that a signal q(t) according to equation (30) is present at the output of the modulus squarer: $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{q(t)} = {\left\lbrack {{R^{2}(t)} + {I^{2}(t)}} \right\rbrack \cdot {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}}} \\ {= {= {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{\left( {{a_{R}^{2}(n)} + {a_{I}^{2}(n)}} \right) \cdot {h_{{GES}\quad 0}^{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot}}}} \\ {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)} \end{matrix} & (30) \end{matrix}$

The signal q(t) is then averaged in an averaging filter 10 consisting of altogether N-1 series-connected timing steps 11 ₁, 11 ₂, . . . , 11 _(N-1), of which the outputs are supplied together with the input of the first timing step 11 ₁ to an adder 12 for summation of the signals q_(m)(t) time-delayed respectively by a different number m of symbol lengths T_(s). The output signal m(t) of the averaging filter 10 can be obtained according to equation (32) by convolution of the signal q(t) with the impulse response h_(M)(t) of the averaging filter 10 as presented in equation (31). $\begin{matrix} {{h_{M}(t)} = {\sum\limits_{m = 0}^{N - 1}{\delta\left( {t - {mT}_{S}} \right)}}} & (31) \\ \begin{matrix} {{m(t)} = {{q(t)}*{h_{M}(t)}}} \\ {= {\sum\limits_{m = 0}^{N - 1}{\left\lbrack {{R^{2}\left( {t - {mT}_{S}} \right)} + {I^{2}\left( {t - {mT}_{S}} \right)}} \right\rbrack \cdot}}} \\ {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {mT}_{S}} \right)} \right)} \end{matrix} & (32) \end{matrix}$

Finally, in the subsequent maximum detector 13, the maximum of the averaged, modulus-squared, filtered received signal e(t), which corresponds, according to equation (20), to the maximum of the log likelihood function l(ε) and therefore to the sought timing offset ε of the clock synchronisation, is determined.

The knowledge obtained with regard to a PAM, QPSK or π/4-QPSK modulated signal for clock synchronisation on the basis of the maximum-likelihood estimation method is used by analogy below for the clock synchronisation of a VSB signal. For this purpose, the mathematical relation for a VSB signal s_(VSB)(t) according to equation (33) is converted below into a form equivalent to the equation (1) for a PAM, QPSK or π/4-QPSK modulated signal. $\begin{matrix} {{s_{VSB}(t)} = {\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{q(v)} \cdot {\delta\left( {t - {v \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)}}}} & (33) \end{matrix}$

In this context, the values q(v) in a 2VSB signal represent the symbol sequence with the symbol alphabet {+1, −1} and the symbol duration T_(VSB), to which an additional pilot carrier is added.

As in the case of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated signal, the transmitter filter for a VSB signal is also a cosine filter. However, by way of distinction from a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK-modulated signal, it is symmetrical to the frequency ${f = {\frac{1}{4} \cdot f_{SVSB}}},$ wherein f is the symbol frequency f_(sVSB) of the VSB signal inverse to the symbol period. Its transmission function H_(sVSB)(f) is therefore derived from a displacement of the transmission function H_(s)(f) of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated signal according to equation (21) by the frequency $f = {\frac{1}{4} \cdot f_{SVSB}}$ in the sense of equation (34) and FIG. 5. $\begin{matrix} {{H_{SVSB}(f)} = {H_{S}\left( {f - {\frac{1}{4} \cdot f_{Symbol\_ VSB}}} \right)}} & (34) \end{matrix}$

The impulse response h_(SVSB)(t) of the transmission filter for a VSB signal is therefore derived according to equation (35): $\begin{matrix} {{h_{SVSB}(t)} = {{h_{S}(t)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t}}} & (35) \end{matrix}$

The VSB signal s_(FVSB)(t) disposed at the output of the transmitter filter 2 is therefore derived, by analogy with the case of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK-modulated signal in equation (2), from a convolution of the VSB signal according to equation (33) with the impulse response h_(SVSB)(t) of the transmitter filter according to equation (35), and is described mathematically by equation (36), which is mathematically converted in several further stages: $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{s_{FVSB}(t)} = {\left( {{h_{S}(t)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t}} \right)*{\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{q(v)} \cdot {\delta\left( {t - {v \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)} \cdot}}}} \\ {=={\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{q(v)} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {v \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}{({t - {vT}_{VSB}})}}}}} \\ {=={{\mathbb{e}}^{j\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t} \cdot {\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{q(v)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}v} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {v \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)}}}}} \end{matrix} & (36) \end{matrix}$

According to equation (37), the parameter b(v) is introduced for the term ${q(v)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}v}$ in equation (36), $\begin{matrix} {{b(v)} = {{q(v)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}v}}} & (37) \end{matrix}$

If the parameter b(v) is taken separately for even-numbered and odd-numbered v, the mathematical relationship in equation (38) is obtained for the parameter b(v) for even-numbered v=2n (n: integer), which leads to real values a_(R)(n) after a mathematical conversion. $\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{b(v)}_{v = {2n}} = {{\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}2n} \cdot {q\left( {2n} \right)}}} \\ {= {{\mathbb{e}}^{{- {j\pi}}\quad n} \cdot {q\left( {2n} \right)}}} \\ {{=={\left( {- 1} \right)^{n} \cdot {q\left( {2n} \right)}}}:={a_{R}(n)}} \end{matrix} & (38) \end{matrix}$

In the case of odd-numbered v=2n+1 (n: integer), the mathematical relationship in equation (39) is obtained for the parameter b(v), which, after mathematical conversion, leads to complex values j·a_(r)(n): $\begin{matrix} {\begin{matrix} {{b(v)}_{v = {{2n} + 1}} = {{\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}{({{2n} + 1})}} \cdot {q\left( {{2n} + 1} \right)}}} \\ {= {{j \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n + 1} \cdot {q\left( {{2n} + 1} \right)}}:={j \cdot {a_{I}(n)}}}} \end{matrix}{{The}\quad{sum}\quad{\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{q(v)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}v} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {v \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)}}}}} & (39) \end{matrix}$ in equation (36) can be subdivided according to equation (40) into a partial sum for even-numbered v=2n and respectively odd numbered v=2n+1: $\begin{matrix} {{\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{q(v)} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{\pi}{2}v} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {v \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)}}} = {\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{{b(v)}_{v = {2n}} \cdot {{h_{S}\left( {t - {2{n \cdot T_{VSB}}}} \right)}++}}{\sum\limits_{v = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{b(v)}_{v = {{2n} + 1}} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {\left( {{2n} + 1} \right) \cdot T_{VSB}}} \right)}}}}}} & (40) \end{matrix}$

The mathematical relationship for the output signal s_(FVSB)(t) at the output of the transmitter filter 2 in equation (36) can therefore be transferred, according to equation (40) taking into consideration equations (38) and (39), into equation (41): $\begin{matrix} {{s_{FVSB}(t)} = {{\mathbb{e}}^{j\quad\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot h_{S}}\left( {t - {2{n \cdot T_{VSB}}}} \right)}} +} \\ {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {2{n \cdot T_{VSB}}} - T_{VSB}} \right)}}}} \end{pmatrix}}} & (41) \end{matrix}$

If the vestigial-sideband-modulated baseband received signal r_(VSB)(t) corresponding to the VSB output signal s_(FVSB)(t) at the output of the transmitter filter 2, ignoring the noise signal n(t), is mixed with a signal ${\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t},$ if the symbol duration T_(VSB) according to equation (42) is set to be equal to half of the symbol duration T_(s) of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated signal, and if the cosine filter T_(s) of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK modulated signal, frequency-displaced according to equation (34), is used as the transmitter filter of the VSB signal, a mathematical relationship for the modified baseband received signal r_(VSB)′(t) is derived, starting from equation (41), as shown in equation (43) $\begin{matrix} {\quad{T_{VSB} = {\frac{1}{2} \cdot T_{S}}}} & (42) \\ {{r_{VSB}^{\prime}(t)} = {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot h_{S}}\left( {t - {n \cdot T_{S}}} \right)}} + {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{S}\left( {t - {n \cdot T_{VSB}} - \frac{T_{VSB}}{2}} \right)}}}}}} & (43) \end{matrix}$

By contrast with the mathematical term for a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK signal in equation (2), the mathematical term for the modified VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)′(t) provides a quadrature component, which is phase-displaced by half a symbol length T_(s) relative to the in-phase component, and therefore corresponds to an offset QPSK signal.

By analogy with equation (8) for a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK signal, the modified VSB transmitted signal in the baseband s_(VSBNF)′(t), in which the timing offset ε of the clock signal and the existing frequency offset and phase offset Δf and Δφ of the carrier signal has already been taken into consideration, is described, starting from the mathematical relationship in equation (43), by equation (44): $\begin{matrix} {{s_{VSBNF}^{\prime}(t)} = {\begin{bmatrix} {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{S}\begin{pmatrix} {t -} \\ {{ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \end{pmatrix}}}} +} \\ {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{S}\begin{pmatrix} {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} -} \\ {\frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \end{pmatrix}}}}} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2\pi\quad\Delta\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\varphi}})}}}} & (44) \end{matrix}$

Once again, in the presence of a modified VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)′(t) according to equation (43), the output signal v_(VSB)′(t) of the estimation filter 7 can be derived from the mathematical relationship in equation (25) for the output signal v(t) of the estimation filter 7 in the case of a PAM, QPSK or π/4 QPSK signal s(t) and is presented in equation (45): $\begin{matrix} {{v_{VSB}^{\prime}(t)} = {\begin{bmatrix} {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{GES}\begin{pmatrix} {t -} \\ {{ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \end{pmatrix}}}} +} \\ {j \cdot {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{GES}\begin{pmatrix} {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} -} \\ {\frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \end{pmatrix}}}}} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2\pi\quad\Delta\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\varphi}})}}}} & (45) \end{matrix}$

By analogy with the impulse response h_(GES)(t−εT_(S)−nT_(S)) in equation (26), the mathematical relationship in equation (46) can be determined for the impulse response $\begin{matrix} {{{h_{GES}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot {h_{GES}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}} = {{h_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n} \cdot {\sin\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S\quad}}} \right)} \right)}}} & (46) \end{matrix}$

The combined terms in equations (47) and (48) can be formulated on the basis of the mathematical terms in equations (26) and (46), and accordingly, in the presence of a modified VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)′(t), the mathematical context for the output signal v_(VSB)′(t) of the estimation filter 7 can be transferred from equation (46) to equation (49). $\begin{matrix} {{R_{VSB}(t)} = {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{R}(n)} \cdot {h_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n}}}} & (47) \\ {{I_{VSB}(t)} = {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{a_{I}(n)} \cdot {h_{{GES}\quad 0}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot \left( {- 1} \right)^{n}}}} & (48) \\ {{v_{VSB}^{\prime}(t)} = {\begin{bmatrix} {{{R_{VSB}(t)} \cdot {\cos\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}} + {j \cdot}} \\ {{I_{VSB}(t)} \cdot {\sin\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{j{({{2{\pi\Delta}\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\quad\varphi}})}}}} & (49) \end{matrix}$

In the presence of a modified VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)′(t), as in the prior art with a PAM, QPSK or π/4-QPSK signal, if the output signal v_(VSB)′(t) of the estimation filter 7 were to be supplied to a modulus squarer, a signal q_(VSB)′(t) would be obtained at the output of the modulus squarer 9 according to equation (50): $\begin{matrix} {{q_{VSB}^{\prime}(t)} = {{{R_{VSB}^{2}(t)} \cdot {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}} + {{I_{VSB}^{2}(t)} \cdot {\sin^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}}}} & (50) \end{matrix}$

The mathematical relationship of the signal q_(VSB)′(t) from equation (50) is converted, resolving the combined terms R_(VSB)(t) and I_(VSB)(t), into the anticipated value E{q_(VSB)′(t)} of the signal q_(VSB)′(t) in equation (51). This exploits the trigonometric relationship ${\sin\quad(x)} = {\cos\quad\left( {x - \frac{\pi}{2}} \right)}$ and the fact that the symbol alphabet of a modified 2VSB signal contains only the values {±1}, which do not correlate with one another over the individual sampling times nT_(s). As a result of the absence of a correlation, the individual products a_(R)(iT_(s))·a_(R)(jT_(s)) and respectively a_(j)(iT_(s))·a_(I)(jT_(s)) cancel each other out at different sampling times iT_(s) and jT_(s) respectively, while the products a_(R) ²(iT_(s)) and a_(I) ²(iT_(s)) each have the value +1 at the same sampling time iT_(s). $\begin{matrix} {{E\left\{ {q_{VSB}^{\prime}(t)} \right\}} = \begin{bmatrix} {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{h_{{GES}\quad 0}^{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot}} \\ {{\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)} +} \\ \begin{matrix} {\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{{h_{{GES}\quad 0}^{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot}} \\ {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - \frac{T_{S}}{2}} \right)} \right)} \end{matrix} \end{bmatrix}} & (51) \end{matrix}$

As can easily be recognised, with the introduction of an auxiliary function ${{w\left( {t - {nT}_{S}} \right)} = {{h_{{GES}\quad 0}^{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}} - {nT}_{S}} \right)} \cdot {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}}},$ the equation (51) can be converted to the equation (52) for the signal E{q_(VSB)′(t)}: $\begin{matrix} {{E\left\{ {q_{VSB}^{\prime}(t)} \right\}} = {{\sum\limits_{n = {- \infty}}^{+ \infty}{w\left( {t - {nT}_{S}} \right)}} + {w\left( {t - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{S}} \right)}}} & (52) \end{matrix}$

Since for all n, the respective auxiliary function w(t−nT_(s)) is a function, which is limited to the range ${{n \cdot T_{S}} - {\frac{T_{S}}{2} \cdot}} \leq {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \leq {{n \cdot T_{S}} + \frac{T_{S}}{2}}$ and which is even at the time t−εT_(S)=n·T_(s); and at the same time, for all n, the respective auxiliary function $w\left( {t - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{s}} \right)$ is a function, which is limited to the range n·T_(s)≦t−εT_(S)≦2·n·T_(s) and which is even at the time ${{t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} = {{n \cdot T_{s}} + \frac{T_{S}}{2}}},$ a constant function is derived by superimposing all auxiliary functions w(t−nT_(s)) and $w\left( {t - \frac{T_{S}}{2} - {nT}_{s}} \right)$ for the anticipated value E{q_(VSB)′(t)} of the signal q_(VSB)′(t) according to equation (53), and the determination of the timing offset ε of the clock synchronisation of a VSB modulated signal via a detection of a maximum according to the prior art is dispensed with. E{q _(VSB)′(t)}=const.  (53)

However, if a pure squaring without modulus formation is implemented according to the invention instead of a modulus squaring of the output signal v(t) of the estimation filter 7 the mathematical relationship shown in equation (54) is obtained, in a first embodiment of the device for clock synchronisation of a VSB signal according to FIG. 5, starting from equation (49) for the output signal q_(VSB)″(t) after a pure squarer 16: $\begin{matrix} {{q_{VSB}^{''}(t)} = {\begin{bmatrix} {{{R_{VSB}^{2}(t)} \cdot {\cos^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}} -} \\ {{{I_{VSB}^{2}(t)} \cdot {\sin^{2}\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)}} +} \\ {j \cdot 2 \cdot {R_{VSB}(t)} \cdot {I_{VSB}(t)} \cdot} \\ {\cos{\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right) \cdot}} \\ {\sin\left( {2\pi\quad\frac{f_{S}}{2}\left( {t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}} \right)} \right)} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{j2}{({{2{\pi\Delta}\quad{ft}} + {\Delta\varphi}})}}}} & (54) \end{matrix}$

Using the relationships ${\cos\quad(x)} = {\frac{1}{2}\left( {{\mathbb{e}}^{j\quad x} + {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad x}} \right)}$ and ${{\sin\quad(x)} = {\frac{1}{2j}\left( {{\mathbb{e}}^{j\quad x} + {\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\quad x}} \right)}},$ the mathematical relationship for the signal q_(VSB)″(t) in equation (54) can be transformed according to equation (55). $\begin{matrix} {{q_{VSB}^{''}(t)} = {\begin{bmatrix} {\frac{1}{4}{\left( {{R_{VSB}(t)} + {I_{VSB}(t)}} \right)^{2} \cdot}} \\ {{\mathbb{e}}^{j{({2\pi\quad{f_{S}{({t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}})}} +} \\ {\frac{1}{4}{\left( {{R_{VSB}(t)} - {I_{VSB}(t)}} \right)^{2} \cdot}} \\ {{\mathbb{e}}^{- {j{({2\pi\quad{f_{S}{({t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}})}}} +} \\ {\frac{1}{2}\left( {{R_{VSB}^{2}(t)} - {I_{VSB}^{2}(t)}} \right)} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{j2}{({{2{\pi\Delta}\quad{ft}} + {\Delta\varphi}})}}}} & (55) \end{matrix}$

The signal q_(VSB)″(t) represents a superimposition of three periodic signal components rotating respectively at the frequency f_(S)+Δf, −f_(S)+Δf and Δf, each of which can be sampled with the Dirac pulses of the additively and multiplicatively linked combined terms R_(VSB)(t) and I_(VSB)(t) By contrast with the anticipated value E{q_(VSB)′(t) } of the signal q_(VSB)′(t) discussed above, the signal q_(VSB)″(t) therefore represents a periodic signal, which contains a discrete spectral pair ±f_(s), of which the maximum can be determined with a maximum detector 13 and which supplies the sought timing offset ε for the clock synchronisation of a VSB signal.

The mathematical relationship for the signal q_(VSB)″(t) in equation (55) can be further simplified by resolving the combined terms R_(VSB) ²(t) and I_(VSB) ²(t):

The spectrum associated with the anticipated value E{R_(VSB) ²(t) } of the combined term R_(VSB) ²(t) and the anticipated value E{I_(VSB) ²(t) } of the combined term I_(VSB) ²(t) is observed in order to determine the anticipated value E{R_(VSB) ²(t) } of the combined term R_(VSB) ²(t) and, by analogy, the anticipated value E{I_(VSB) ²(t)} of the combined term I_(VSB) ²(t). The associated modulus of the spectrum, which corresponds respectively to the convolution |H_(GES0)(f)|*|H_(GES0)(f)| of the modulus |H_(GES0)(f)| of a low pass filter symmetrical to the frequency f=0 relative to itself, is used by way of approximation, for the spectrum of the respective anticipated values E{R_(0QPSK) ²(t)} and E{I_(0QPSK) ²(t)}. Because of the band limitation of the low pass filter at the level of ${{f} \leq \frac{f_{S}}{2}},$ the result of the convolution is band-limited to |f|≦f_(s), so that the spectrum of the respective anticipated values E{R_(VSB) ²(t)} and E{I_(VSB) ²(t) } is zero at all relevant frequencies ±i·f_(S) (i: integer factor) with the exception of the equal component (i=0). The corresponding anticipated values E{R_(VSB) ²(t)} of the combined term R_(VSB) ²(t) and E{I_(VSB) ²(t) of the combined term I_(VSB) ²(t) are therefore derived taking into consideration equation (50) and (51) respectively as a constant factor c₀, which corresponds to the modulus of the result of the convolution |H_(GES0)(f=0)|*|H_(GES0)(f=0)| at the frequency 0.

The two convolutions |H_(GES0)′(f)|*|H_(GES0)′(f)| and respectively |H_(GES0)″(f)|*|H_(GES0)″(f)|, which differ because of the addition and subtraction from the above convolution |H_(GES0)(f)|*|H_(GES0)(f)|, are derived for the anticipated values E{(R_(VSB)(t)+I_(VSB)(t))²} and E(R_(VSB)(t)−I_(VSB)(t))²} in exactly the same manner as for the observation of the moduli of the associated spectra described above. Here also, the convolutions are band-limited to |f|≦f_(s) because of the squaring, so that the spectra of the anticipated values E{(R_(VSB)(t)+I_(VSB)(t))²} and E{(R_(VSB)(t)−I_(VSB)(t))²} are zero at the frequencies ±i·f_(S) with the exception of the equal component (i=0). The corresponding anticipated values E{(R_(VSB)(t)+I_(VSB)(t))²} and E{(R_(VSB)(t)−I_(VSB)(t))²} are therefore derived as constant values c₀′ and c₀″.

Accordingly, starting from equation (55), the mathematical relationship in equation (56) is derived for the anticipated value E{q_(VSB)″(t)} of the signal q_(VSB)″(t): $\begin{matrix} {{E\left\{ {q_{VSB}^{''}(t)} \right\}} = {\begin{bmatrix} {{c_{0}^{\prime} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{j2\pi}\quad{f_{S}{({t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}}} +} \\ {c_{0}^{''} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{- {j2\pi}}\quad{f_{S}{({t - {ɛ\quad T_{S}}})}}}} \end{bmatrix} \cdot {\mathbb{e}}^{{j2}{({{2{\pi\Delta}\quad f\quad t} + {\Delta\varphi}})}}}} & (56) \end{matrix}$

It is evident from equation (56) that the determination of the timing offset ε is reduced to a pure observation of the phase. The mathematical relationships in equation (57) and (58) are obtained from the two phases φ₁ and φ₂ of the two complex signal components of the anticipated value E{q_(VSB)″(t)} of the signal q_(VSB)″(t) in equation (56). The timing offset ε is derived by subtraction of the phases φ₁ and φ₂ and subsequent scaling with the factor 1/4π according to equation (59): $\begin{matrix} {\varphi_{1} = {{{- 2}{\pi ɛ}} + {2\Delta\quad\varphi}}} & (57) \\ {\varphi_{2} = {{2{\pi ɛ}} + {2\Delta\quad\varphi}}} & (58) \\ {ɛ=={\frac{1}{4\pi}\left( {{- \varphi_{1}} + \varphi_{2}} \right)}} & (59) \end{matrix}$

Against this mathematical background, the following section describes the first embodiment of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal. In this context, identical reference numbers are used for functional units, which have not changed by comparison with the device for clock synchronisation according to the prior art shown in FIG. 3.

In the case of an inverted position of the sideband, the first embodiment of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal, as shown in FIG. 6, implements a mirroring of the sideband on the VSB received signal r_(VSB)(t) into the normal position at the carrier frequency f_(T) in a unit for sideband mirroring 14.

Following this, in a down mixer 15, the VSB received signal r_(VSB)(t) is mixed down by means of a mixer signal ${\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t}$ by the frequency f_(SVSB/)4 into a modified received signal r_(VSB)′(t) according to equation (43).

Following this, in a similar manner to the prior art as shown in FIG. 3, the modified VSB received signal r_(VSB)′(t) is sampled in a downstream sampling and holding element 8 with an oversampling factor os. The sampled, modified VSB baseband received signal e_(VSB)′(t) is supplied to an estimation filter 7 to remove data-dependent jitter in the useful signal. By contrast with the prior art, the output signal v_(VSB)(t) of the estimation filter 7 is then squared with a squarer 16 without a formation of the modulus.

The squared and filtered VSB baseband received signal q_(VSB)″(t) is then averaged, also by analogy with the averaging filter 12 of the prior art in FIG. 3. In this context, the averaging according to the invention is subdivided into a first averaging filter 17 with the impulse response h_(MIT1)(t) and a second averaging filter 18 following later in the signal path with the impulse response h_(MIT2)(t). The separation of the averaging into two averaging steps is based on the fact that the two spectral lines of the squared, filtered received signal q_(VSB)″(t), as shown in equation (56), are frequency-displaced relative to the two symbol frequencies ±f_(s) by the frequency offset 2·Δf of the carrier signal. To ensure that these two spectral lines of the squared, pre-filtered received signal q_(VSB)″(t) are disposed within the throughput range of the averaging filter, the bandwidth of the first averaging filter 17 must be designed to be appropriately broad.

The impulse response h_(MIT1)(t) of the first averaging filter 17 is derived, by an analogy with the impulse response h_(M)(t) of the averaging filter of the prior art, as shown in equation (34), from an averaging of a total of N symbols. The bandwidth of the first averaging filter 17, expanded in view of the above consideration, brings about a shortened averaging length. In order to achieve an averaging length required for a given averaging quality in the device according to the invention, a second averaging filter 18 is introduced, which filters via a multiple of the averaging length of the first averaging filter 17—altogether I·N symbol lengths.

In a first discrete Fourier transformer 19 following the first averaging filter 17, the Fourier transform of the pre-filtered, squared and averaged received signal is determined at the frequency f_(s). The Fourier transform of the pre-filtered, squared and averaged received signal is calculated in a similar manner at the frequency −f_(s), in a second discrete Fourier transformer 20. The Fourier transforms of the pre-filtered, squared and averaged received signal at the frequency f_(s) is conjugated with regard to its phase in a downstream conjugator 21. Finally, the conjugated Fourier transform of the pre-filtered, squared and averaged received signal at the frequency f_(s) is multiplied in a multiplier 22 by the Fourier transform of the pre-filtered, squared and averaged received signal at the frequency −f_(s).

The multiplier 22 is followed by the second averaging filter 18 mentioned above with the impulse response h_(MIT2)(t) according to equation (60). $\begin{matrix} {{h_{{MIT}\quad 2}(t)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{I - 1}{\delta\left( {t - {i \cdot N \cdot T_{S}}} \right)}}} & (60) \end{matrix}$

The second averaging filter 18 is used to remove further interference.

In the final signal-processing unit 23, in the sense of equation (59), the timing offset ε is determined by argument formation—determination of the phase of the two Fourier transforms of the pre-filtered, squared and averaged received signal q_(VSB)″(t) multiplied together—at the two frequencies ±f_(s) and scaled by the factor 1/4π.

In procedural stage S10, the associated first embodiment of the method according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal, as shown in FIG. 7, implements a mirroring of the sideband of the VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)(t) by the carrier frequency f_(T) from an inverted position into a normal position, if the sideband is disposed in the inverted position.

In the next procedural stage S20, the VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)(t) is mixed down according to the invention with a mixer signal ${\mathbb{e}}^{{- j}\frac{2\pi}{4T_{VSB}}t}$ by the frequency f_(SVSB/)4 into a modified received signal r_(VSB)′(t) according to equation (43).

In the next procedural stage S30, the modified VSB baseband received signal r_(VSB)′(t) is oversampled in a sampling and holding element 8 with an oversampling factor os of 8, in order to satisfy the Nyquist condition by frequency doubling on the basis of squaring and multiplication.

In procedural stage S40, an estimation filtering of the sampled, modified VSB baseband received signal e_(VSB)′(t) takes place in an estimation filter 7 according to equation (45) or respectively (49). The transmission function H_(EST)(f) of the estimation filter 7 according to equation (22) is presented in FIG. 8. The transmission function H_(GES)(f) composed of the transmission filter and estimation filter with its equidistant zero throughputs according to equation (23) is absolutely necessary for asymptotic (SNR=∞), error-free estimates of the timing offset ε.

Finally, in the next procedural stage S50 the filtered and sampled VSB baseband received signal v_(VSB)′(t) is squared in a squarer 16.

The filtered, sampled and squared received signal q_(VSB)″(t) is averaged in the subsequent procedural stage S60 in a first averaging filter 17 according to equation (31) over a total of N symbol lengths.

The next procedural stage S70 comprises the determination of the discrete Fourier transform Q_(VSB)″(f) respectively at the frequencies ±f_(s) in the first and second discrete Fourier transformer 19 and 20.

The conjugation of the discrete Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″(fs) at the frequency f_(s) is implemented in the next procedural stage S80 in a conjugator 21.

The conjugated Fourier transform Q_(VSB)″*(fs) at the frequency f_(S) is multiplied by the Fourier transform Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)) in a multiplier 22 at the frequency −f_(s)in the subsequent procedural stage S80.

The second averaging of the two Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″*(f_(S)) and Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)) multiplied together over a total of I·N symbol lengths takes place in the next procedural stage S100 in a second averaging filter 18.

In the final procedural stage S110, the argument of the two Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″*(f_(S)) and Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)) multiplied with one another and averaged is determined, and a scaling with a scaling factor 1/4π is carried out to determine the timing offset ε.

FIG. 9 shows a second embodiment of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal. Identical functional units to those in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 6 have been indicated with the same reference numbers.

The second embodiment of the device according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal shown in FIG. 9 is identical, in its functional structure along the signal path as far as the squarer 16, to the first embodiment shown in FIG. 6. After this, by contrast with the first embodiment, the averaging in the first averaging filter and the discrete Fourier transformation in the first and second discrete Fourier transformer including the conjugation in the conjugator are exchanged with one another in the second embodiment.

Accordingly, the squarer is followed by the conjugator 21 for the conjugation of the filtered, sampled and squared received signal q_(VSB)″(t), with a first discrete Fourier transformer 19 for the implementation of the discrete Fourier transformation of the filtered, sampled, squared and conjugated received signal q_(VSB)″(t) at the frequency f_(S) and parallel to this, a second discrete Fourier transformer 20 for the implementation of the discrete Fourier transformation of the filtered, sampled and squared received signal q_(VSB)″(t) at the frequency −f_(S)

In the second embodiment, the first averaging filter 17 of the first embodiment, is connected as a first averaging filter 17A and 17B respectively downstream of the first and second discrete Fourier transformer 19 and 24 for the implementation of the first averaging of the two discrete Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″*(f_(S)) and Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)). The further functional structure in the signal path of the second embodiment corresponds to the functional structure of the first embodiment.

The flow chart for the associated method according to the invention for clock synchronisation with a VSB signal is presented in FIG. 10. As shown in FIG. 10, the procedural stages S115 to S150 and S190 to S210 of the second embodiment are identical to the corresponding procedural stages S10 to S50 and S90 to S110 of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 7 and will not be explained in any further detail below.

In procedural stage S160 of the second embodiment of the method according to the invention, the filtered, sampled and squared received signal q_(VSB)″(t) is conjugated in a conjugator 21.

In the following procedural stage S170, the Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″*(f_(S)) at the frequency f_(S) and Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)) at the frequency −f_(S) are calculated respectively in a first and second discrete Fourier transformer 19 and 20 from the conjugated, filtered, sampled and squared received signal q_(VSB)″(t) and the un-conjugated, filtered, sampled and squared received signal q_(VSB)″(t).

In the next procedural stage S180, the first averaging of the two discrete Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″*(f_(S)) at the frequency f_(s) and Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)) at the frequency −f_(s) takes place according to equation (31) in a first averaging filter 17A and 17B respectively.

The multiplication of the averaged, discrete Fourier transforms Q_(VSB)″*(f_(s)) at the frequency f_(s) and Q_(VSB)″(−f_(S)) at the frequency −f_(s) take place in procedural stage S190 exactly as in the first embodiment of the method according to the invention. Reference is therefore made to the design of the first embodiment presented above for the further explanation of the remaining procedural stages.

The invention is not restricted to the embodiments presented here. In particular, in addition to 2VSB signals, VSB signals with higher-value symbol alphabet—for example, 8VSB signals and 16VSB signals—are also covered by the invention. The invention also covers VSB signals without a pilot carrier. 

1. Method for clock synchronisation between an amplitude-modulated or phase-modulated received signal (r(t)) and a transmitted signal (s(t)) by estimating the timing offset (ε) between the received signal (r(t)) and the transmitted signal (s(t)) by means of maximum-likelihood estimation, wherein the maximum-likelihood estimation is realised by an estimation filtering (S40; S140) dependent upon the transmission characteristic, a downstream, nonlinear signal-processing function (S50, S150) and an averaging filtering (S60, S100; S180, S200), wherein the received signal (r(t)) is a modified vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)′(t)) and the nonlinear signal-processing function (S50, S150) maintains the alternating components in the spectrum of the filtered vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (v_(VSB)′(t)).
 2. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 1, wherein the modified, vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)′(t)) is obtained from a vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)′(t)) by down mixing (S20; S120) by one quarter of the symbol frequency (f_(SVSB/)4) of the vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)(t)).
 3. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 1, wherein the symbol duration (T_(VSB))of the modified vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)′(t)) is half of the symbol duration (T_(S)) of the received signal (r(t)).
 4. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 1, wherein the nonlinear signal-processing function (S50, S50) is a squaring without modulus formation (S50, S150).
 5. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 4, wherein the squaring without modulus formation (S50, S50) realises a superimposition of the squared real and imaginary component of the filtered vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (v_(VSB)′(t)) maintaining the alternating component in the spectrum of the filtered vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (v_(VSB)′(t)).
 6. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 1, wherein a Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″(f)) of the pre-filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)) is determined respectively at the positive and negative symbol frequency (±f_(s)) (S70; S170).
 7. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 6, wherein the Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″(f)) of the pre-filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)) is conjugated at the positive symbol frequency (f_(s)) (S80; S160) and is then multiplied by the Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″(−f_(s))) of the pre-filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)) at the negative symbol frequency (−f_(s)) (S90; S190).
 8. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 1, wherein the averaging filtering (S60, S100; S180, S200) consists of a first averaging filtering (S60; S180) and a second averaging filtering (S100; S200).
 9. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 8, wherein the bandwidth of the first averaging filtering (S60; S180) is increased until the spectral lines of the filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)) displaced respectively by the frequency offset (2·Δf) of the carrier frequency relative to the positive and negative symbol frequency (±fs), comes to be disposed within the throughput range of the first averaging filter (S60; S180).
 10. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 8, wherein the first averaging filtering (S60) is implemented before the determination of the two Fourier transforms (S70).
 11. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 8, wherein the first averaging filtering (S180) is implemented respectively after the determination of the two Fourier transforms (S170).
 12. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 8, wherein the duration of the impulse response of the second averaging filtering (S100; S200) is increased, until the duration of the impulse response of the first averaging filtering (S60; S180), reduced by the increased bandwidth, in combination with the duration of the impulse response of the second averaging filtering (S100; S200), reaches a total duration, which is required for smoothing interference superimposed on the pre-filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)).
 13. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 8, wherein the second averaging filtering (S100; S200) is implemented after multiplication (S90; S190) of the conjugated Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″*(fs)) at the positive symbol frequency (f_(s)) by the Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″(−f_(s)) at the negative symbol frequency (−f_(s)).
 14. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 2, wherein in the case of an inverted position of the sideband of the vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)(t)), a mirroring (S10; S115) of the sideband from the inverted position into the normal position is implemented before the down mixing (S20; S120).
 15. Method for clock synchronisation according to claim 2, wherein the vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)(t)) is a vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)(t)) with two real symbols (2VSB), with four real symbols (4VSB), with eight real symbols (8VSB), with 16 real symbols (16VSB) or with M real symbols ((M) VSB).
 16. Device for clock synchronisation between an amplitude-modulated or phase-modulated received signal (r(t)) and a transmitted signal (s(t)) by estimating the timing offset (ε) between the received signal (r(t)) and the transmitted signal (s(t)) by means of a maximum-likelihood estimator, wherein the maximum-likelihood estimator consists of an estimation filter (7) dependent upon the transmission characteristic, a downstream nonlinear signal-processing unit (16) and an averaging filter (17, 17A, 17B, 18), wherein the received signal (r(t)) is a modified vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)′(t)) and the nonlinear signal-processing unit (16) is a squaring unit without a modulus former (16).
 17. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 16, wherein a down mixer (15) and a subsequent sampling and holding element (8) are connected upstream of the estimation filter (7), in order to generate the modified vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)′(t)) from a vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (r_(VSB)(t)).
 18. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 16, wherein the averaging filter (17, 17A, 17B, 18) consists of a first averaging filter (17, 17A, 17B) and a second averaging filter (18) connected downstream.
 19. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 18, wherein a first and a second discrete Fourier transformer (19, 20) is connected respectively between the squaring unit (16) and the second averaging filter (18), in order to implement the Fourier transformation at the positive and negative symbol frequency (+f_(s), −f_(s)).
 20. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 19, wherein a conjugator (21) is connected upstream or downstream of the first discrete Fourier transformer (19) for the implementation of the Fourier transformation at the positive symbol frequency (+f_(s)).
 21. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 19, wherein the first averaging filter (17) is connected upstream of the first and second discrete Fourier transformers (19, 20).
 22. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 19, wherein a first averaging filter (17A, 17B) is connected downstream of the first and second discrete Fourier transformer (19, 20) respectively.
 23. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 21, wherein a multiplier (22) is connected downstream of the first and second discrete Fourier transformer (19, 20) or of the two first averaging filters (17A, 17B) for the multiplication of the conjugated Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″*(fs)) of the pre-filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)) at the positive symbol frequency (+f_(s)) by the Fourier transform (Q_(VSB)″(−fs) of the pre-filtered and squared vestigial-sideband-modulated received signal (q_(VSB)″(t)) at the negative symbol frequency (−f_(s)).
 24. Device for clock synchronisation according to claim 17, wherein a unit for sideband mirroring (14) is connected upstream of the down mixer (15).
 25. Digital storage medium with electronically-readable control signals, which can cooperate in such a manner with a programmable computer or digital signal processor, that the method according to claim 1 is executed.
 26. Computer software product with program-code means stored on a machine-readable carrier, in order to implement all of the stages according to claim 1, when the program is executed on a computer or a digital signal processor.
 27. Computer software with program-code means, in order to implement all of the stages according to claim 1, when the program is executed on a computer or digital signal processor.
 28. Computer software with program-code means, in order to implement all of the stages according to claim 1, when the program is stored on a machine-readable data medium. 